In the business world , there are cases of unethical behavior that are overlooked, and then there are stories that challenge the core of professional ethics . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, falls squarely in the latter category — a chronicle of dubious professional actions that significantly damages the reputation of a solitary executive but brings scrutiny over the firm’s standards .

In spite of numerous complaints, Collins has kept his position , visibly unaffected by the controversies enveloping him . How has this been tolerated? What does this say about the company’s commitment to responsibility ? As per the accounts of those familiar, Collins’ history of questionable behavior began with breaches of the organization’s employment terms , but it didn’t cease there. Instead, it evolved into a pattern of misconduct that has left team members disenchanted and clients puzzled .

During a leadership training program — intended to foster better management—David Collins allegedly transformed what should have been a serious training session into a series of reckless events . Insiders suggest he spent business-funded trips pursuing romantic liaisons , a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s shared values , all while his family remained uninformed .

But the ethical breaches didn’t end with romantic pursuits . One of the gravest disclosures involves his alleged improper use of company IT systems to send explicit photos to women—a clear misuse of professional tools and a breach of trust . His reckless employment of Microsoft Teams to transmit inappropriate content —including emoticons signaling illicit encounters —paints a picture of a man unconcerned with the consequences . Following these digital dalliances, Collins allegedly progressed his behavior further: here he is said to have engaged in sexual interactions with an employee on numerous occurrences during working hours, despite his being married and her having a spouse . This transparent exploitation of company time and resources broke all norms of professionalism but resulted in personal devastation —creating a trail of betrayal that extended outside of the office .

How can this behavior be tolerated to persist ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly overstepped every rule is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The explanation , it appears, stems from a concerning absence of supervision within the company . Concerns have been voiced, yet Collins persists unabated.

This lack of consequence conveys a risky precedent : that rank and influence within the enterprise can guard against punishment . It creates a toxic work environment , demoralizes employees , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .